On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 4:17 PM, James Nelson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Is there anywhere to get a sneak preview on the discussions about the > future of codegen? > > There is not much more that what is already discussed earlier in the list . APT takes responsibility of codegen out of GWT compiler and get more inline with the rest of the java world and works on GWT/Android/server. That is basically "what would you do if there was no TypeOracle nor GWT.create". I think one could actually start experimenting with it today. > Andres and I have both invested time in some extensions of ast-based > codegen, and could really use some time and forewarning to adapt our > strategy to stay future-friendly with out apis. > I actually already warned about this earlier. For any GWT.create proposal, we should put into account moving into APT. That being said I think it is still valuable for GWT to support some kind of magic-method replacement mechanism. > -- > http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "GWT Contributors" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
