We are going to introduce configuration file based exports in the future however for now your best bet is to super-source the files and add annotations that you need.
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Joseph Gardi <[email protected]> wrote: > that makes sense. How would I apply the @JsExport and @JsType to a third > party library without forking it though? > > On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 8:11 PM, 'Goktug Gokdogan' via GWT Contributors < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> @JsExport exports constructors and static members and pins them so they >> act as entry points and not get pruned. >> On the other hand, @JsType enforces generation of javascript compatible >> prototype for the class so if there is a method named "someMethod" in the >> Java object, same method with same name exists in javascript object. >> So if you are coming from GWT-Exporter, you can have the same behavior by >> adding both JsExport and JsType to the same class that you want to use in >> javascript land (this part may change before we release the first phase of >> JsInterop - it is little bit confusing) >> >> On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Joseph Gardi <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I have a few questions about exporting: >>> It said: "@JsExport can only be applied to constructors, static fields >>> and static methods, and whole concrete classes. >>> ". Does this mean that we'll just continue to use GWT-exporter for this >>> or will there be another way. Also, what will be the easiest way to export >>> the API's of entire libraries? I had this need but decided it was too >>> difficult so I just used a javaScript library instead. >>> >>> On Monday, September 9, 2013 at 7:13:43 PM UTC-4, Goktug Gokdogan wrote: >>>> >>>> Interesting idea; though we still need an annotation when the name is >>>> not a valid java identifier and also can't find a good name to mark the >>>> exception case. >>>> Another issue is anyone who is not aware of convention can be surprised >>>> by it (e.g. developer renames a method and the method is no longer a js >>>> function). >>>> >>>> Do you aware of any popular java lib that solves a similar problem by >>>> conventions so that I can take a look for ideas? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Jörg Hohwiller <joerg.h...@googlemail. >>>> com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Goktug, >>>>> >>>>> nice approach. IMHO getters and setters should not be required to be >>>>> annotated by @JsProperty. Instead a method looking like a getter or >>>>> setter that is actually not a property accessor should be annotated >>>>> (Convention over configuration). >>>>> I would love to see this coming... >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> Jörg >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors >>>>> --- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "GWT Contributors" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscribe@ >>>>> googlegroups.com. >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "GWT Contributors" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected] >>> . >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/e19b5c6d-cbe0-4993-962b-ca01c3eb6d7a%40googlegroups.com >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/e19b5c6d-cbe0-4993-962b-ca01c3eb6d7a%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>> . >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the >> Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. >> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-web-toolkit-contributors/TlFmmJfH7Pk/unsubscribe >> . >> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >> [email protected]. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAN%3DyUA1fWZQQevrPEx1dXkpCJNLJXMAKn7-0ouDJdA2SG1zHNA%40mail.gmail.com >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAN%3DyUA1fWZQQevrPEx1dXkpCJNLJXMAKn7-0ouDJdA2SG1zHNA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "GWT Contributors" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CALUwUVQEshzmwp1ro5_ava8XJa0_viduiFByFCDc8Fe5k8%3Dq8Q%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CALUwUVQEshzmwp1ro5_ava8XJa0_viduiFByFCDc8Fe5k8%3Dq8Q%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAN%3DyUA3S_kqqibO_guTNxDYOu6nkWYTQVXHJjxatGN_u0n%3DLJQ%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
