On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Benjamin DeLillo <[email protected]> wrote:
> For an implementation to be accepted would it have to conform to the entire > Java Formater spec? > http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/util/Formatter.html > > We may have 'known' limitations. > Would an implementation lacking the Date/Time conversions be acceptable? > > Yes, I think that is a possibility. > Would an implementation that wraps sprintf.js be acceptable (if the licensing > is compatible)? https://github.com/alexei/sprintf.js > > > I prefer stuff in core to be pure Java if there is no strong reason to do otherwise. What about a minimal positional substitution implementation and nothing more? > > Not sure about this one; perhaps other people may have a good arguments for one way or the other. > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "GWT Contributors" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/bc6afdc0-eb87-4815-b076-6db912f8f94c%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/bc6afdc0-eb87-4815-b076-6db912f8f94c%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAN%3DyUA1NRNSdG-u%3D1pPyQKiNaeqWkdmeTvsuZ4wWJC3JHsF_6Q%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
