If trying to provide a fairly complete duplicate of the JRE functionality is too much of a point of contention, would it be more acceptable to provide a simpler/lighter-weight string interpolation implementation behind e.g. GWT.format() or to follow the NumberFormat convention a StringFormat class?
On Friday, February 6, 2015 at 11:31:32 PM UTC-5, Benjamin DeLillo wrote: > > For an implementation to be accepted would it have to conform to the entire > Java Formater spec? > http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/util/Formatter.html > > Would an implementation lacking the Date/Time conversions be acceptable? > > Would an implementation that wraps sprintf.js be acceptable (if the licensing > is compatible)? https://github.com/alexei/sprintf.js > > > What about a minimal positional substitution implementation and nothing more? > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/9d1583ef-ae7b-41e2-9eca-207e8ef33062%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
