So I agree with you 99%. What we disagree is on this point: On the other hand, I also think that exists some level of > confusion/misinformation, *but it's not a critical situation* and if you > spent some time in google groups, gerrit or github you end up knowing > exactly what's happening (doubts to google+ and ##irc).
I believe it is a critical situation for people who might want to come into the community or for those attempting to justify not moving to something new. There is no clear roadmap on the main GWT site.. Search for GWT Roadmap, the first result is a link stating GWT 2.8 will be out in 3 months, back in January. There is no clear status of the next release on the main GWT site. There is no clear status of the next release or when it can be expected or what are the blockers on the Contributor forum here. GWT 2.8 milestone on GitHub is only 14%, there are only 3 closed issues and the last release of GWT is almost a year now and only 1 person appears to be working on the next release planned features if those issues are the plan because there is no other apparent plan that has been laid out that I can find accessible. There is no promotion on the main GWT site of the only currently scheduled GWT conference and the normally already scheduled GWT.create conference, there is no chatter about. On Thursday, October 15, 2015 at 11:02:21 AM UTC-7, Ignacio Baca Moreno-Torres wrote: > > IMHO current organization is pretty good, docs in the official page, news > in google+, question and issues in Google groups and you can always chat > with the community in ##gwt. All this 4 places are easy to contribute, so > if you see less info and news is just because the community is not very > news friendly ;). And! I don't think this is bad at all. Maybe is only > motivated by the evolution of GWT, which start as a web framework but now a > days is more a java2js transpiler (at least is the more important and > evolving part, and I think than most of the work by the committee is in the > compiler side of GWT), and I think that front-end communities are just more > likely to share lot of cool things than compiler communities. > > You probably find a lot of more cool things in the gxt, vaadin or errai > blogs, which are front end frameworks. > > If you want to see 'not so cool' but much more technical interenting news > you just subscribe to this feed > *https://github.com/gwtproject/gwt/commits/master.atom > <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fgwtproject%2Fgwt%2Fcommits%2Fmaster.atom&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNEm7ZlM_c_pcDsHEmxNRkUygbthGQ>* > > At least, that's how I see it... ;) > > On the other hand, I also think that exists some level of > confusion/misinformation, but it's not a critical situation and if you > spent some time in google groups, gerrit or github you end up knowing > exactly what's happening (doubts to google+ and ##irc). > > El jue., 15 de octubre de 2015 8:35, Brian Pedersen <[email protected] > <javascript:>> escribió: > >> +1 all the way. >> >> I use every chance I have to spread the word about the changes JS Interop >> will bring to the web, but the apparent lack of engagement in the community >> from the people driving GWT, is giving me second thoughts. >> >> The official blog used to be OK, but that changed when google open >> sourced it, and now the closest you get to official information is 6 months >> old videos on youtube. >> >> I believe this is already driving people away from GWT, at a time where >> we should be getting people back, drawn by the awesomeness of GWT 3.0. >> >> >> Den onsdag den 14. oktober 2015 kl. 21.51.57 UTC+2 skrev JonL: >>> >>> We've been using GWT for a long time. There was some trepidation when >>> Google moved GWT into the open source realm and the steering committee was >>> announced. A lot of good things are happening. I see a lot of movement >>> here and there, but some of it appears as if it is un-directed and >>> un-coordinated. Without joining like 15 different groups, it seems >>> impossible to get a full understanding of what is happening in GWT. As a >>> project that is currently utilized by projects of many levels, I think the >>> only thing that keeps GWT at the forefront of anyones mind at this time has >>> more to do with inertia than anything else. The closest thing that I can >>> come by, which appears to pull the disparate parts of GWT community >>> together is gwtdaily.com blog, but there is no indication how that is >>> run, it is not linked between any of the other gwt sites >>> >>> So here's my questions: >>> >>> Are there any plans to create a "Voice of GWT" presence anywhere which >>> could act as a goto location to view progress, like the old GWT blog? >>> >>> Besides each steering committee member advocating GWT as used in their >>> paradigm, is there anyone who is considered the advocate for just GWT >>> itself. IE Vaadin promotes Vaadin, ArcBees promotes GWT-P and their >>> various GWT projects, Sencha promotes GXT, who is going out and saying, >>> lets just use GWT? >>> >>> I think if there was one person who was acting as part of the GWT >>> steering committee as that advocate that had a blog and was able to take >>> the time to bring all the disparate threads together to present a overall >>> view of the current development plan and future of GWT and status of the >>> major efforts under the various tents, I think that would go a long way to >>> assuaging many peoples fears that GWT is dying out and becoming irrelevant. >>> >>> Or even just a central blog where members of the committee would commit >>> to posting regularly. The Google+ community is good, but I see as more of >>> a discussion board and not just the platform where the community can >>> announce things. >>> >>> The format of gwtdaily.com is good and I see that people can submit >>> posts to it so that might be a good location, I believe it is run by a >>> contributor/committee member, but it doesn't appear official and has no >>> links from the official GWT sites. >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "GWT Contributors" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] >> <javascript:>. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/67e4bbca-8394-46a2-aa78-c4a76cbcee2d%40googlegroups.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/67e4bbca-8394-46a2-aa78-c4a76cbcee2d%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/3b3e36f8-d64b-48ef-95e7-2bd6a1d32a3d%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
