Errai UI ? On 17 Nov 2015 00:41, "Stephen Haberman" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> I guess I will be trying UiBinder with GQuery and not rely on Widget for >> my project. The UiBinder might disappear, but we are using mostly plain >> HTML and Bootstrap styles. So we are only interested in binding events. The >> UiBinder templates will be easy to migrate later on. >> > > FWIW this is what we're doing, with a small variation: > > Use UiBinder, use regular CSS styling (bootstrap/etc.), but only very > minimal/core widgets, like TextBox (just an input tag), HTMLPanel, and > ListBox (select tag). > > My theory/hope is that porting away from UiBinder + TextBox/ListBox to > some other templating language + "basically a text box, basically a select > box" replacements should not be too painful. > > So, yes, it's still using widgets, but it's not the full slate of layout > panels, trees, cells, etc. that would be much harder to port. > > That said...if you could get away with widget-less UiBinder? That's > interesting. I've not really tried that. E.g. just use an <input > ui:field="..."> instead of "gwt:TextBox" at all. That sounds like a good > idea to me... > > - Stephen > > > > >> >> Any idea what is going on with Singular ? Is it also abandoned or will it >> finally appear after GWT 2.8 is final ? >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Alain Ekambi <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Well the hope is that someone will step in and port existing js >>> libraries to gwt 3 or create new one ? See vaadin sencha etc .. We will def >>> port our ext js wrapper to gwt3 >>> On 16 Nov 2015 11:29, "Robert Stone" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sunday, 15 November 2015 15:37:29 UTC, Stephen Haberman wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> My worry about "just pick a mainstream JS framework and use it via >>>>> JSInterop" is that if you're a) coupled to a JS environment for unit >>>>> testing and b) interfacing with a framework that is inherently >>>>> dynamic/untyped, what's the benefit of using GWT in the first place? >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> And this for me sums up GWTs main issues going forward. The benefit >>>> before was that existing Java devs could use GWT to work on all the layers >>>> of an application. GWT 3 will force (not a bad thing) Java devs to use >>>> JavaScript for their views and will also force them to deal with >>>> integrating JS and Java code. At this point, you have to ask 'Why bother >>>> with Java/GWT at all' - switch the full application to pure JS. >>>> >>>> For existing large projects, switching to GWT 3 is almost a non-starter >>>> as there will be far too much existing view code to convert over so they >>>> will have to stick with the GWT 2 stream and hope that it remains well >>>> supported. This is the situation my company face with one of our products. >>>> >>>> So GWT 3 is not ideal for new projects and doesn't help with existing >>>> projects. Where is it's market? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "GWT Contributors" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to >>>> [email protected]. >>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/342561ff-64da-4e7a-aec4-6e9b84846f09%40googlegroups.com >>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/342561ff-64da-4e7a-aec4-6e9b84846f09%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>> . >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "GWT Contributors" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected] >>> . >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAGw%3D_ty7rjFQmUZhYv95aQBj8KgwSKcGk0nEyUkdTd4upBNtdA%40mail.gmail.com >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAGw%3D_ty7rjFQmUZhYv95aQBj8KgwSKcGk0nEyUkdTd4upBNtdA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>> . >>> >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "GWT Contributors" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CABrJHW2uZjj_BAdr8WZJCN%2BQX_p91zvUxE%2BTMBa%3DZpjijaDRyA%40mail.gmail.com >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CABrJHW2uZjj_BAdr8WZJCN%2BQX_p91zvUxE%2BTMBa%3DZpjijaDRyA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "GWT Contributors" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CANnRKuW3FS6EcB4cP6wyfrv_Ozuj9T%2Bgh3cLf%2BM%2Bi2tLQxS4Yg%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CANnRKuW3FS6EcB4cP6wyfrv_Ozuj9T%2Bgh3cLf%2BM%2Bi2tLQxS4Yg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAGw%3D_twBmnjAwHT_%2BfkWSRyA6yDMxg7x91koxH6m%2BdL%3DchuKUg%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
