On Friday, November 17, 2017 at 5:37:59 PM UTC+1, Thomas Broyer wrote: > > > > On Friday, November 17, 2017 at 4:11:18 PM UTC+1, Colin Alworth wrote: >> >> Sounds like there is enough diversity of opinion that this discussion >> should go on - first step seems to be deciding if we think the CLA >> > > Some links about CLAs: > https://julien.ponge.org/blog/in-defense-of-contributor-license-agreements/ > & > https://julien.ponge.org/blog/developer-certificate-of-origin-versus-contributor-license-agreements/ > > https://web.archive.org/web/20150917011232/http://www.computerworlduk.com/blogs/simon-says/should-open-source-communities-avoid-contributor-agreements-3569648/ > http://contributoragreements.org/ > Some tools to manage CLAs: https://cla-assistant.io/ (by SAP), > https://www.clahub.com/ > > As a) purely "community-driven projects", that b) won't even be used by > Google (their original author), I would say that we don't need CLAs (also, > the choice of the Apache License protects the users from a lot of things > already). > That said, IANAL, and I'm not doing any work here on behalf of my > employer; so people for whom CLAs are important should weigh in. >
Fwiw, Gradle, as a project lead by a company (Gradle, Inc.), which is not our case, just ditched CLAs in favor of https://developercertificate.org: https://discuss.gradle.org/t/change-in-the-contribution-process/25011 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/e1f40067-65c5-4243-beb2-1c7fbbd1c4be%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
