+1 for dropping support for all IE versions (8-10) Jens schrieb am Mittwoch, 6. Oktober 2021 um 10:22:50 UTC+2:
> I think the gecko permutation has very little to no special treatment of > IE 11 and there are some bugs reported because of that. So there isn't much > to deprecated for IE 11. > > Personally I only use safari, gecko permutation and define safari as > fallback permutation. In addition I use some code to check runtime vs > compile time user agent and if they are different display a warning that > some things might not work. That warning basically triggers for any exotic > user-agent and any IE below 11. > > Dropping all IE permutations (8-10) should be totally fine I guess. > Especially because the new, smaller GWT modules only care about IE 11 (if > at all). gwt-dom for example has only two checks for safari and everything > else is treated the same. > > -- J. > > ManfredTremmel schrieb am Montag, 4. Oktober 2021 um 11:07:11 UTC+2: > >> Am Donnerstag, 30. September 2021, 18:49:56 CEST schrieb Colin Alworth: >> >> > So, is there any objection at this time to dropping what remains of >> IE8, >> > IE9, and IE10 support from GWT? Then, we can reevaluate IE11 at some >> later >> > date, for GWT itself? Various migrated GWT modules have focused their >> > efforts on well-supported browsers, and are likely to only support IE11 >> by >> > accident anyway. >> >> Let's drop the IE-Permutations. IE11 uses the gecko permutation, so no >> need to >> drop it. In my newer projects, I only use safari permutation for all >> browsers, >> so even dropping all browser specific permutations wouldn't affect me. >> >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/2804ef85-5111-45b8-9341-024b61694025n%40googlegroups.com.
