Gaurav, I think you're trying to do something that GWT does not support, as GWT builds a lot of its value atop the notion of a statically-typed language (Java).
About your use case: it's not one. If you would write a use case with a real actor, I'll bet we could find a statically-typed design that would satisfy it. Walden On Aug 24, 3:11 am, masterGaurav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have a scenario wherein I need to refer to methods/fields in the > class that may be created on the fly - similar to how it is possible > in JavaScript. > > Or, how do I refer to any field/function if I know the object-context > and the property-name at runtime? > > Would it be mandatory to make the type inherited from > JavaScriptObject? If that's the case, I lose "public constructor" and > non-final methods. :( > > What's the best way around? > > The use-case is: > > I need to load some entries from configuration settings and then > populate the object. The entries may include setting values to > properties. The values may be simple numeric/string/boolean or > reference to functions (function names), and then I need to refer to > those properties/functions dynamically. > > Thanks in Advance! > > -- > Cheers, > Gaurav Vaishhttp://www.edujini-labs.comhttp://www.mastergaurav.com > --------------------------------- --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
