Chrome uses Google's version of WebKit (whick is a fork of KHTML), therefore as far as a DOM impl is concerned, it *is* Safari.
If you use Analytics, you won't see Chrome turn up in its own right yet (rather suprisingly) - it's included with Safari 525.13 which does turn up as a genuine Safari browser, but not much - most people who use Sarari are on 525.20, 525.20.1, 525.21 and 525.22 Where Chrome differs, is the use of the V8 JavaScript engine, but JS is a lot more standard than rendering engines - the way a for-next loop loops is not really up for your own interpretation. Ian 2008/9/3 matias_warrior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > What about a GWT DOM impl for Chrome? > > On Sep 3, 7:24 am, Reinier Zwitserloot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > askar: Did you try to contribute to GWT? > > > > They accept anyone, and are willing to listen to any patch proposal > > you have, provided you of course do the work. It doesn't look like > > anyone cares if you actually work at google. This meritocracy system > > is essentially the same as any open source project, so what possible > > good would it do if google 'completely transfer it to open source > > community'. > > > > On Sep 2, 3:52 pm, askar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Recently I have been feeling pessimistic about GWT future, although we > > > are using GWT in our product. It seems like development slowed down > > > significantly during 1.5 release cycle and I'm anxious whether Google > > > guys can finally stop working on GWT and completely transfer it to > > > open source community. Undoubtedly, the choice of technology for > > > development of enterprise applications depends on technology's > > > perspectives and it's a pity we don't know how Google envisages GWT > > > roadmap. From that point of view, Adobe AIR and Microsoft Silverlight > > > seem to be better options as a platform to use for next several years. > > > I think we can be sure that both technologies will be there for a long > > > time; can you say the same about GWT? Should you invest in writing > > > tons of code for the platform that will be abandoned soon? > > > > > Having said that, I do think that GWT is a great technology that we > > > get for free. It has a great advantage over AIR and Silverlight - it > > > does not need any additional plugins for the browser. I hope that GWT > > > will be integrated somehow with Google Chrome because that would mean > > > longer life for GWT as a platform. > > > -- Ian http://examples.roughian.com ========================================================================================= Internet communications are not secure and therefore I will not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions do not necessarily represent what I really think unless otherwise specifically stated, and even then, I might still be lying. This message may contain confidential privileged information, but if it does, I've nicked it from someone else. If you have received this email in error then tough, hit delete, and don't bother me about it, I really don't care. Batteries not included. Contents can go up as well as down. Shares can vary in size. May cause drowsiness, if affected, go to sleep. ========================================================================================= --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
