Guess I don't see the point, I can't think of anything I've needed to
do that can't be done with Composite and/or Panel.  Do you have a
specific example of something *commonly* done that'd be much easier
with this class?  Otherwise it would seem to be unnecessarily bloating
the API and thus creating more confusion, just to make a rare case
slightly easier.  Sometimes less is more...

jk

On Aug 26, 4:44 pm, Folke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Have you ever wondered how to write a widget that contains other
> widgets but you don't want to extend Panel because Panel implements
> HasWidgets? HasWidgets forces you to implement the ability to remove
> child widgets via Iterator.remove() and remove() directly. But your
> child widgets are completely managed by your parent widget and should
> not be removable.
>
> Such a container widget is currently only possible by extending Panel
> and then wrapping a Composite around the subclass just to hide the
> HasWidgets methods. But it can be much simpler. We introduce a new UI
> base class that provides the well-known adopt() and orphan() methods
> of Panel but does not implement HasWidgets. This base class also
> provides methods to call Widget.onAttach() and onDetach().
>
> Enter the Container.
>
> A Container should provide methods to call setParent(), onAttach(),
> and onDetach(), which are package-private and protected, respectively,
> and Container should take over the adopt() and orphan() methods from
> Panel. This would make Panel merely a semi-abstract implementation of
> HasWidgets.
>
> Please take a look a this 
> document:http://docs.google.com/View?docID=dgf5d73j_17c99djxgc
> To attach or detach children you have to call attachChild() and
> detachChild() or one of the convenience methods for collections.
>
> For a more detailed explanation read this 
> thread:http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors/browse...
>
> I also opened an issue and attached a patch. If you like to try this
> out check out the GWT 1.5.1 source and apply the patch. If you only
> like to try out Container you can create a package
> "com.google.gwt.user.client.ui" in your project and copy the source
> into 
> Container.java.http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=2810
>
> Now I would like to hear what you think of this enhancement. Do you
> think you have any use for this? Is there something you would rather
> change?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to