The screenshot you posted yesterday showed a java -version from the command line with a runtime environment version 1.6.0_07-b06 and a hotspot version 10.0-b23.
As it says here: http://java.sun.com/javase/6/webnotes/ReleaseNotes.html "Included in JDK 6u7 is version 10.0 of the Java HotSpot Virtual Machine." Looks like you've successfully switched to the latest version, and it's still broken. BTW - your by-section fade doesn't work in IE7 either. Just chewed up all my cpu time and had to kill IE darkflame wrote: > Just done that, had to select the install folder manualy as it wasnt > on the list, but then the _07 version appeared. > > Exact same problem, this time, however, the resulting error says; > > # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (10.0-b23 mixed mode, sharing > windows-x86) > # Problematic frame: > > 10.0-b23? Thats still wrong isnt it :-/ > > Also, another observation, is that the error only happens if the > screen is being watched. If its not visible (eg, alt-tabed onto > another window), it keeps going till you flick back and then it > crash's. > Potentialy its something wrong with the screen update itself. > > > > On Oct 13, 6:42 pm, Paul Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> You can have any number of versions of java installed. From the windows >> command prompt, whichever is first in your PATH environment variable is >> the one that will be used (and if you never add java to your PATH, then >> you will get the last one to be installed since it drops a java.exe in >> system32). >> >> In eclipse, you choose the JRE in Run Configurations->JRE >> >> >> >> Thomas Wrobel wrote: >> >>> Thats strange, as thats what Command.com said when I type "java -version" >>> >>> I have just updated anyway to this version; >>> http://cds.sun.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/WFS/CDS-CDS_Developer-Si... >>> (which the release notes says is _07) >>> >>> But I it still dosnt work, and is still seems to be confused over the >>> versions; >>> http://www.cuyperscode.com/CuypersCode2_WIP/test%20folder/dual.jpg >>> >>> Is it possible I somehow have two versions installed :? >>> Maybe the route of the problem is something really weird with my java >>> installation. >>> >>> 2008/10/13 Paul Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> >>>> Your error message indicates you were using 1.6.0_03 >>>> >>>> darkflame wrote: >>>> >>>>> I have heard from someone using Java 1.6.0_05 that it works fine. It >>>>> seems the _07 update (which I was on) is causing the problems. >>>>> >>>>> On Oct 13, 5:00 pm, darkflame <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Yes, try this in >>>>>> IE;http://www.cuyperscode.com/CuypersCode2_WIP/test%20folder/TestProject... >>>>>> Press Button2 to test the simple fade, Button1 to start the by-section >>>>>> fade out. >>>>>> >>>>>> crash's IE6 at the same point the crash happens in hosted. >>>>>> (the by-section fade out dosnt work at all in Firefox or Opera...but >>>>>> that might be my code) >>>>>> >>>>>> On Oct 13, 4:53 pm, "alex.d" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> What about Web-mode? Any problems there? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 13 Okt., 16:44, darkflame <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have been expirementing developing a "transition" effect in GWT, >>>>>>>> that is made by fadeing out a 10x10 array of images in sequence. >>>>>>>> The fade's, individualy, work ok. But if more then one is attempted at >>>>>>>> a time I get this; >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>> # An unexpected error has been detected by Java Runtime Environment: >>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>> # EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION (0xc0000005) at pc=0x77f9d45a, pid=2388, >>>>>>>> tid=2212 >>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>> # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (1.6.0_03-b05 mixed mode, >>>>>>>> sharing) >>>>>>>> # Problematic frame: >>>>>>>> # C [ntdll.dll+0x1d45a] >>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>> # An error report file with more information is saved as >>>>>>>> hs_err_pid2388.log >>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>> # If you would like to submit a bug report, please visit: >>>>>>>> # http://java.sun.com/webapps/bugreport/crash.jsp >>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In my eclipse window. >>>>>>>> This is the first time have had this sort of problem, and it seems to >>>>>>>> point to a problem with Java itself no? >>>>>>>> My code is relatively simple, using the >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Style style = >>>>>>>> ThisImage.getElement().getStyle(); >>>>>>>> style.setProperty("filter", >>>>>>>> "alpha(opacity="+opacity+")"); >>>>>>>> style.setProperty("opacity", >>>>>>>> ""+(opacity/100)); >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Techique in a timer on an extended image object to trigger the fade, >>>>>>>> and then a loop triggering the fades in sequence. >>>>>>>> If I just detach rather then fade, it works. (and also makes a nice >>>>>>>> transition...), but as soon as the fader is used, I get the above >>>>>>>> crash notice. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have logged at the log file and cant make that much sense of it >>>>>>>> myself. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Any advice for proceeding? Should I report to Sun? or is it likely a >>>>>>>> bug in Google? Or is it my fault in some way ;) >>>>>>>> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
