Thanks for claifying that for me. Its sort-of a relief to know my system is set up right, even if it does mean putting a halt to this line of development.
Its still interesting that it works in IE7 under "1.6.0_05-b13" (at least on an XP laptop), but sadly they dont seem to keep the sub- versions up. I also tested the beta version, but same problems. Guess I'll just wait to see if Sun had an answer, I put an error report in allthough not sure if they will test stuff with GWT. On Oct 14, 9:47 am, Paul Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The screenshot you posted yesterday showed a java -version from the > command line with a runtime environment version 1.6.0_07-b06 and a > hotspot version 10.0-b23. > > As it says here:http://java.sun.com/javase/6/webnotes/ReleaseNotes.html > > "Included in JDK 6u7 is version 10.0 of the Java HotSpot Virtual Machine." > > Looks like you've successfully switched to the latest version, and it's > still broken. > > BTW - your by-section fade doesn't work in IE7 either. Just chewed up > all my cpu time and had to kill IE > > > > darkflame wrote: > > Just done that, had to select the install folder manualy as it wasnt > > on the list, but then the _07 version appeared. > > > Exact same problem, this time, however, the resulting error says; > > > # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (10.0-b23 mixed mode, sharing > > windows-x86) > > # Problematic frame: > > > 10.0-b23? Thats still wrong isnt it :-/ > > > Also, another observation, is that the error only happens if the > > screen is being watched. If its not visible (eg, alt-tabed onto > > another window), it keeps going till you flick back and then it > > crash's. > > Potentialy its something wrong with the screen update itself. > > > On Oct 13, 6:42 pm, Paul Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> You can have any number of versions of java installed. From the windows > >> command prompt, whichever is first in your PATH environment variable is > >> the one that will be used (and if you never add java to your PATH, then > >> you will get the last one to be installed since it drops a java.exe in > >> system32). > > >> In eclipse, you choose the JRE in Run Configurations->JRE > > >> Thomas Wrobel wrote: > > >>> Thats strange, as thats what Command.com said when I type "java -version" > > >>> I have just updated anyway to this version; > >>>http://cds.sun.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/WFS/CDS-CDS_Developer-Si... > >>> (which the release notes says is _07) > > >>> But I it still dosnt work, and is still seems to be confused over the > >>> versions; > >>>http://www.cuyperscode.com/CuypersCode2_WIP/test%20folder/dual.jpg > > >>> Is it possible I somehow have two versions installed :? > >>> Maybe the route of the problem is something really weird with my java > >>> installation. > > >>> 2008/10/13 Paul Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >>>> Your error message indicates you were using 1.6.0_03 > > >>>> darkflame wrote: > > >>>>> I have heard from someone using Java 1.6.0_05 that it works fine. It > >>>>> seems the _07 update (which I was on) is causing the problems. > > >>>>> On Oct 13, 5:00 pm, darkflame <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>>>>> Yes, try this in > >>>>>> IE;http://www.cuyperscode.com/CuypersCode2_WIP/test%20folder/TestProject... > >>>>>> Press Button2 to test the simple fade, Button1 to start the by-section > >>>>>> fade out. > > >>>>>> crash's IE6 at the same point the crash happens in hosted. > >>>>>> (the by-section fade out dosnt work at all in Firefox or Opera...but > >>>>>> that might be my code) > > >>>>>> On Oct 13, 4:53 pm, "alex.d" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>>>>>> What about Web-mode? Any problems there? > > >>>>>>> On 13 Okt., 16:44, darkflame <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> I have been expirementing developing a "transition" effect in GWT, > >>>>>>>> that is made by fadeing out a 10x10 array of images in sequence. > >>>>>>>> The fade's, individualy, work ok. But if more then one is attempted > >>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>> a time I get this; > > >>>>>>>> # > >>>>>>>> # An unexpected error has been detected by Java Runtime Environment: > >>>>>>>> # > >>>>>>>> # EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION (0xc0000005) at pc=0x77f9d45a, > >>>>>>>> pid=2388, > >>>>>>>> tid=2212 > >>>>>>>> # > >>>>>>>> # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (1.6.0_03-b05 mixed mode, > >>>>>>>> sharing) > >>>>>>>> # Problematic frame: > >>>>>>>> # C [ntdll.dll+0x1d45a] > >>>>>>>> # > >>>>>>>> # An error report file with more information is saved as > >>>>>>>> hs_err_pid2388.log > >>>>>>>> # > >>>>>>>> # If you would like to submit a bug report, please visit: > >>>>>>>> # http://java.sun.com/webapps/bugreport/crash.jsp > >>>>>>>> # > > >>>>>>>> In my eclipse window. > >>>>>>>> This is the first time have had this sort of problem, and it seems to > >>>>>>>> point to a problem with Java itself no? > >>>>>>>> My code is relatively simple, using the > > >>>>>>>> Style style = > >>>>>>>> ThisImage.getElement().getStyle(); > >>>>>>>> style.setProperty("filter", > >>>>>>>> "alpha(opacity="+opacity+")"); > >>>>>>>> style.setProperty("opacity", > >>>>>>>> ""+(opacity/100)); > > >>>>>>>> Techique in a timer on an extended image object to trigger the fade, > >>>>>>>> and then a loop triggering the fades in sequence. > >>>>>>>> If I just detach rather then fade, it works. (and also makes a nice > >>>>>>>> transition...), but as soon as the fader is used, I get the above > >>>>>>>> crash notice. > > >>>>>>>> I have logged at the log file and cant make that much sense of it > >>>>>>>> myself. > > >>>>>>>> Any advice for proceeding? Should I report to Sun? or is it likely a > >>>>>>>> bug in Google? Or is it my fault in some way ;) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
