|
Hello Ed: That's exactly one of the matters that worries me more: the transition from the version 2.7 to the new versions and, thus, the lack of documentation (or worse, the existence of outdated or contradictory documentation). I'm worried to learn new concepts that I'll have to "un-learn" when the new versions arrive :/ . I started with the tutorials, but then I thought about this issue and decided to stop to re-consider the adoption of GWT. What you say about the conversion of GWT into a transpiler cheers me up. Because more than an abstraction of the DOM, what I need is to replace the formula HTML + CSS + JS with HTML + CSS + Java. I guess that a developer used to Swing will have an opinion opposite to mine and will want full abstraction, but I prefer to use something closer to the browser's reality. After all, if you want abstraction, projects like Vaadin or JSF offers something simplier. I'll look for more information about GWT 2.8 and 3.0 and then decide either if I wait to see what they bring, or start with it now. Thank you. On 26/10/15 14:57, Ed wrote:
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
- GWT as a "thin" layer over JavaScript? negora
- Re: GWT as a "thin" layer over JavaScript? JonL
- Re: GWT as a "thin" layer over JavaScript? Ed
- Re: GWT as a "thin" layer over JavaScript? negora
- Re: GWT as a "thin" layer over JavaScript? Jens
