|
Hello Jens: That has been a very clarifying response. JsInterop seems to fit better with what I need from GWT. A fast way to build a gate between new code written in Java and existing libraries in _javascript_. I read a little about JSNI some days ago but it didn't attracted me too much, sincerely. Although I understand that it still is the best method to write a functionality that is implemented in a different way by each browser. Fortunately this is less frequent nowadays. About Elemental 2.0, that's another thing that will be really useful. It sounds exciting to have an API that's constantly up to date with the W3C standards. Now I'm going to take a look to the document about JsInterop that you've indicated. Thank you, Jens and the other users, for having spent your time to clarify my doubts. On 26/10/15 17:34, Jens wrote:
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
- GWT as a "thin" layer over JavaScript? negora
- Re: GWT as a "thin" layer over JavaScript? JonL
- Re: GWT as a "thin" layer over JavaScript? Ed
- Re: GWT as a "thin" layer over JavaScript? Jens
- Re: GWT as a "thin" layer over JavaScript? negora
