I noticed Vaadin TouchKit is a Apache licensed open source project. If I 
want to develop a mobile application, should I use TouchKit or Vaadin GWT 
polymer elements? I do appreciate your feedback about how to develop mobile 
application using Vaadin technology.

David

On Saturday, April 22, 2017 at 12:28:26 PM UTC-4, Manuel Carrasco wrote:
>
> You are right Nándor, Vaadin is going to replace our current widgetset by 
> polymer based elements.
>
> One of the ways we explored in our labs is to wrap every single polymer 
> element with a GWT Widget or Element, and this is the reason we published 
> the gwt-polymer-elements. Additionally we explored other ways such as 
> direct usage of webcomponents directly from the Vaadin server side. And 
> even we explored in our labs how to use polymer in other platforms like 
> Angular, etc.
>
> As I mentioned in my first email Vaadin main motivation on doing that is 
> leaving framework communities lead their integration with polymer, and 
> Vaadin Elements UI Team to focus on delivering polymer Components.
>
> So the strategy of Vaadin is that our widgetset uses standards so as it 
> can be used in any platform including our Vaadin Framework. It is not 
> happening currently because our framework widgetset is only usable from 
> vaadin, even it cannot be used from GWT.
>
> Said that, this does not mean that Vaadin is abandoning GWT, we just want 
> to use webcomponents standards for the UI part of the Vaadin Framework, so 
> as it can be used at the same time in any framework and we can obtain more 
> feedback to improve them. Obviously, since Vaadin is an open-source 
> Company, our polymer elements are Apache licensed.
>
> Additionally, Vaadin indirectly support gwt-polymer-elements since we can 
> still use our Company time  aka 'Community Friday' to collaborate with the 
> project. But Vaadin thinks that it should be owned by the GWT community, 
> because they are the best to contribute with ideas and to feature it.
>
> Thank you
> - Manolo 
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Nándor Előd Fekete <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> Hello Manuel,
>>
>> wasn't Vaadin going into the direction of migrating it's client side 
>> components to web components in the Vaadin Framework itself? If not, can 
>> you shed some light on the motivation behind the decision?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>> On Friday, April 21, 2017 at 9:10:06 PM UTC+2, Manuel Carrasco wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> From today, Vaadin has transferred the ownership of the 
>>> gwt-polymer-elements and gwt-api-generator libraries to me.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/manolo/gwt-polymer-elements/
>>> https://github.com/manolo/gwt-api-generator/
>>>
>>> Vaadin decision is based on encouraging communities to maintain polymer 
>>> bridges for their favourites frameworks, hence Vaadin can focus their 
>>> efforts on delivering high quality UI elements made in Polymer. It also 
>>> happened recently with the Angular2Polymer bridge.
>>>
>>> I will design a roadmap for the next months.
>>>
>>> I'm looking for contributors so let me know who is interested on any 
>>> matter: coding, testing, reporting, answering, etc, and I will grant access 
>>> to the repos.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> - Manolo
>>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "GWT Users" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
>> <javascript:>.
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to