Errai Framework is awesome, and we are using parts of it (like jaxrs); however its too much focussed on javaee specific development (which is great btw but too heavy for general and ever-evolving use-cases and has a steep learning curve viz. custom CDI/IOC). mvp4g <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fmvp4g%2Fmvp4g&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNFZVdRFuONp-UOuqjqn34NLz-YTdg> again uses GIN.
Also, IMO JS frameworks like vue, react or polymer are very good for creating isolated custom components and rendering HTML. However for MVP/data-flow/binding/architecture they might not be the ideal solution (other than if you are going to fully commit to them for future use and as we all know there is a new js framework every month deprecating the old one). Vanilla js (which in this case cross-compiled by the awesome GWT compiler), is the path we would want to take. Still open to other suggestions. On Friday, October 13, 2017 at 10:28:16 AM UTC-4, DavidN wrote: > > I'm also depending on GWTP for my projects. It would be nice if it somehow > got migrated to Dagger, but I guess the company behind it stopped doing GWT > work. > > I'm considering moving to a mix of GWT with Vue.js in combination with > Vue-routing. > > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 4:14 PM Subhrajyoti Moitra <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> U can try http://erraiframework.org/ or https://github.com/mvp4g/mvp4g >> as alternatives. >> >> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 7:30 PM, hy <[email protected] <javascript:>> >> wrote: >> >>> Is anyone using any GWT MVP based framework? >>> >>> We have been using GWTP, however the development on it seems to be >>> stalled and it still depends on GIN, which is also not under active >>> development. >>> >>> GWTP is extremely powerful, however a lack of investment in it recently >>> has been concerning for us and we would like to be sure that our app is >>> future compatible. >>> >>> So, is there any other framework anyone is using out there that works >>> like GWTP and would take minimum transition (from GIN to Dagger, etc.); and >>> has a future compatibility (annotation processing, raw HTML, etc.). >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "GWT Users" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected] >>> <javascript:>. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >>> <javascript:>. >>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "GWT Users" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >> <javascript:>. >> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
