https://github.com/Axellience/vue-gwt
Vue+Gwt On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 9:09 PM, hy <[email protected]> wrote: > Errai Framework is awesome, and we are using parts of it (like jaxrs); > however its too much focussed on javaee specific development (which is > great btw but too heavy for general and ever-evolving use-cases and has a > steep learning curve viz. custom CDI/IOC). > mvp4g > <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fmvp4g%2Fmvp4g&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNFZVdRFuONp-UOuqjqn34NLz-YTdg> > again > uses GIN. > > Also, IMO JS frameworks like vue, react or polymer are very good for > creating isolated custom components and rendering HTML. > However for MVP/data-flow/binding/architecture they might not be the > ideal solution (other than if you are going to fully commit to them for > future use and as we all know there is a new js framework every month > deprecating the old one). > > Vanilla js (which in this case cross-compiled by the awesome GWT > compiler), is the path we would want to take. > Still open to other suggestions. > > > On Friday, October 13, 2017 at 10:28:16 AM UTC-4, DavidN wrote: >> >> I'm also depending on GWTP for my projects. It would be nice if it >> somehow got migrated to Dagger, but I guess the company behind it stopped >> doing GWT work. >> >> I'm considering moving to a mix of GWT with Vue.js in combination with >> Vue-routing. >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 4:14 PM Subhrajyoti Moitra <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> U can try http://erraiframework.org/ or https://github.com/mvp4g/mvp4g >>> as alternatives. >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 7:30 PM, hy <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Is anyone using any GWT MVP based framework? >>>> >>>> We have been using GWTP, however the development on it seems to be >>>> stalled and it still depends on GIN, which is also not under active >>>> development. >>>> >>>> GWTP is extremely powerful, however a lack of investment in it recently >>>> has been concerning for us and we would like to be sure that our app is >>>> future compatible. >>>> >>>> So, is there any other framework anyone is using out there that works >>>> like GWTP and would take minimum transition (from GIN to Dagger, etc.); and >>>> has a future compatibility (annotation processing, raw HTML, etc.). >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "GWT Users" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "GWT Users" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "GWT Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
