Use -strict (alias for -failOnError) too, it will fail early rather than 
ignoring some errors and later failing because of them.

On Tuesday, December 7, 2021 at 10:28:09 AM UTC+1 [email protected] wrote:

> I would try to enable the verbose and debug flags of the compilation.
>
> In my experience sometimes the compilation fails for whatever reason and 
> then the GWT compiler complains that it cannot find the class.
>
> The debug logs of the compilation usually have enough information to 
> diagnose and fix the problem.
>
> Hope this helps a bit.
>
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 11:21 AM mmo <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi and thanks for responding. We will double-check in that direction 
>> although I have doubts that this is the issue, because this has worked fine 
>> with the previous version, i.e. with v2.8.1 the compiler obviously *did* 
>> find the files. Has v2.9.0 a different or more rigid search strategy?
>> On Tuesday, December 7, 2021 at 12:26:11 AM UTC+1 [email protected] 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> It looks like the GWT compiler cannot find the source .java file for 
>>> that class, which it will need.  Perhaps it is in a directory that is not 
>>> covered by the <source> tag in your module.gwt.xml file?
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, December 7, 2021 at 3:02:09 AM UTC+11 mmo wrote:
>>>
>>>> We are trying to migrate a GWT application that is running fine with 
>>>> GWT 2.8.1 to GWT 2.9.0.
>>>> When we do a gwt:run the usual Jetty dialog comes up and without errors 
>>>> nor exceptions and comes to the point where it offers to copy the URL or 
>>>> launch the default browser.
>>>>
>>>> When we copy/paste the URL to the browser we get a ""Compiling SSt" 
>>>> message and then the browser hangs ("SSt" is the name of the application).
>>>>
>>>> On the console we get the output:
>>>> ...
>>>> GET /recompile/sstweb
>>>>    Job ch.zh.ksta.sst.SstWebDevelopment_1_2
>>>>       starting job: ch.zh.ksta.sst.SstWebDevelopment_1_2
>>>>       binding: gxt.device=desktop
>>>>       binding: gxt.user.agent=ie11
>>>>       binding: user.agent=gecko1_8
>>>>       binding: user.agent.os=windows
>>>>       Compiling module ch.zh.ksta.sst.SstWebDevelopment
>>>>          Ignored 20 units with compilation errors in first pass.
>>>> Compile with -strict or with -logLevel set to TRACE or DEBUG to see all 
>>>> errors.
>>>>          Computing all possible rebind results for 
>>>> 'com.gwtplatform.mvp.client.ApplicationController'
>>>>             Rebinding com.gwtplatform.mvp.client.ApplicationController
>>>>                Invoking generator 
>>>> com.gwtplatform.mvp.rebind.ApplicationControllerGenerator
>>>>                   [ERROR] The type 
>>>> 'ch.zh.ksta.sst.client.SstBootstrapper' was not found, either the class 
>>>> name is wrong or there are compile errors in your code.
>>>>                   [ERROR] The type 
>>>> 'ch.zh.ksta.sst.client.SstBootstrapper' was not found, either the class 
>>>> name is wrong or there are compile errors in your code.
>>>>                   [ERROR] There was a problem generating the 
>>>> ApplicationController, this can be caused by bad GWT module configuration 
>>>> or compile errors in your source code.
>>>>          [WARN] For the following type(s), generated source was never 
>>>> committed (did you forget to call commit()?)
>>>>             [WARN] com.gwtplatform.mvp.client.ApplicationControllerImpl
>>>>          Unification traversed 29116 fields and methods and 2736 types. 
>>>> 2699 are considered part of the current module and 2699 had all of their 
>>>> fields and methods traversed.
>>>>          Compiling 1 permutation
>>>>             Compiling permutation 0...
>>>>             Linking per-type JS with 2678 new/changed types.
>>>>             Source Maps Enabled
>>>>          Compile of permutations succeeded
>>>>          Compilation succeeded -- 6,609s
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> We don't understand why the client boots trapper class is not found 
>>>> (assuming the message is correct). It *is* contained in both, the classes 
>>>> folder as well as in the generated .war file and the class' name is 
>>>> correct. We also don't see any compile errors in the code (at least 
>>>> IntelliJ doesn't display any...). 
>>>> Any idea or hint, what might be wrong here? Or in which direction we 
>>>> could search?
>>>> Or any info that might be helpful here to pinpoint this issue?
>>>>
>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "GWT Users" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/088dce7f-05d1-4d2f-81bd-701fb1c27ac6n%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/088dce7f-05d1-4d2f-81bd-701fb1c27ac6n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Vassilis Virvilis
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/e3c6d931-6819-47ac-8b0a-ad0b374d471cn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to