Possibly because Grok originally generated it for GWT 2.7 as I recall and I 
then told Grok the latest version was 2.12.2 and not all the code was 
re-factored.

On Friday, April 18, 2025 at 4:16:07 AM UTC+10 Tim Macpherson wrote:

> Why did it use JSNI ? it's a bit young for that
>
> Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conquer 
> <https://mail.onelink.me/107872968?pid=nativeplacement&c=US_Acquisition_YMktg_315_SearchOrgConquer_EmailSignature&af_sub1=Acquisition&af_sub2=US_YMktg&af_sub3=&af_sub4=100002039&af_sub5=C01_Email_Static_&af_ios_store_cpp=0c38e4b0-a27e-40f9-a211-f4e2de32ab91&af_android_url=https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.yahoo.mobile.client.android.mail&listing=search_organize_conquer>
>
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 12:27 AM, Craig Mitchell
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Very cool.  Impressive it didn't cheat and actually coded it with GWT UI 
> Binder and JSNI.
>
> On Wednesday, 16 April 2025 at 5:40:55 pm UTC+10 bryan wrote:
>
> If anyone is interested, I created a GWT test app styled with Bootstrap. 
> The code is almost entirely written by Grok (99%). Quite amazing what AI 
> can do !
>
> https://vmc.webbtide.com/GWTTest
>
> https://vmc.webbtide.com/source.gz
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "GWT Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion visit 
>
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/0434a5e9-6a00-4a30-ac8c-0dd614eea57dn%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/0434a5e9-6a00-4a30-ac8c-0dd614eea57dn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/9dd9e6c2-4325-44aa-abc9-e011c14167aen%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to