Im surprised it didnt just tell you to use React. =) On Friday, April 18, 2025 at 10:47:18 AM UTC-5 Tim Macpherson wrote:
> JSNI is probably easier than jsinterop in the bootstrap example ? no js > file to create and load, no annotations, but > 1) bit fiddly calling JSNI methods from js, > 2) doesn't do non-native exports ? > > Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conquer > <https://mail.onelink.me/107872968?pid=nativeplacement&c=US_Acquisition_YMktg_315_SearchOrgConquer_EmailSignature&af_sub1=Acquisition&af_sub2=US_YMktg&af_sub3=&af_sub4=100002039&af_sub5=C01_Email_Static_&af_ios_store_cpp=0c38e4b0-a27e-40f9-a211-f4e2de32ab91&af_android_url=https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.yahoo.mobile.client.android.mail&listing=search_organize_conquer> > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 8:31 AM, Frank > <frank....@gmail.com> wrote: > > All those AI tools give/prefer JSNI code over JsInterop. > > For example yesterday I was looking for using SVG in GWT. And Gemini told > me I could for example wrap svg.js in a gwt wrapper. And explicitty told me > that JSNI was a better option then JSinterop with some reasons. It showed > examples of both but recommended going with JSNI. > > In the past I also have seen it multiple times that Gemini and Copilot > tell me to use JSNI. > > > (personnally I actually also find JSNI to be a better solution, but I > don't use it anymore because of the promise of GWT 3 (?...?)) > > Op donderdag 17 april 2025 om 23:48:45 UTC+2 schreef bryan: > > I specifically told Grok I didn't want to use GWTBootstrap3 as I wanted > the latest Bootstrap and wanted to minimise dependencies. > On Friday, April 18, 2025 at 7:18:02 AM UTC+10 Carl Stainton wrote: > > There’s also the GwtBootstrap3 library that’s open source (and has its own > similar demo app). Wonder if the AI had that in its training material … > > On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 at 19:15, 'Tim Macpherson' via GWT Users < > google-we...@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > Why did it use JSNI ? it's a bit young for that > > Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conquer > <https://mail.onelink.me/107872968?pid=nativeplacement&c=US_Acquisition_YMktg_315_SearchOrgConquer_EmailSignature&af_sub1=Acquisition&af_sub2=US_YMktg&af_sub3=&af_sub4=100002039&af_sub5=C01_Email_Static_&af_ios_store_cpp=0c38e4b0-a27e-40f9-a211-f4e2de32ab91&af_android_url=https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.yahoo.mobile.client.android.mail&listing=search_organize_conquer> > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 12:27 AM, Craig Mitchell > <ma...@craig-mitchell.com> wrote: > Very cool. Impressive it didn't cheat and actually coded it with GWT UI > Binder and JSNI. > > On Wednesday, 16 April 2025 at 5:40:55 pm UTC+10 bryan wrote: > > If anyone is interested, I created a GWT test app styled with Bootstrap. > The code is almost entirely written by Grok (99%). Quite amazing what AI > can do! > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "GWT Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion visit > > > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/3abd7770-8303-457d-933f-7e72add74c32n%40googlegroups.com > > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/3abd7770-8303-457d-933f-7e72add74c32n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/b807c993-214d-4df2-b904-b0b9c5f77da5n%40googlegroups.com.
