You've stated some very bold claims. How did you become so convinced of this violation and the need to address it?
Are you the "Beginning Rails" author? On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 4:27 PM, allan <allan1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > LGPL/GPL have the obligation to provide source with any binary > distributions. Source can be provided directly with the binaries or in > an offer, made available to the public for 3 years. > > You cannot fulfill the obligation by pointing to a 3rd party download > site for the source. Go ask Cisco and others who have had to comply > with this requirement. > > GWT/Google provides neither an offer or the source. > > Not only is Google in violation but I, or any one redistributing GWT, > will be violating LGPL as well. I will have to separately provide the > source any time I distribute GWT. > > GWT package should include the source code for any LGPL components. > > How does one get Google GWT project managers to be aware of this issue? > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
