Isn't GWT released under the Apache license? I don't think it's possible for GWT to violate the GPL. Of course, I'm not a lawyer....
Ian On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 1:27 PM, allan <allan1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > LGPL/GPL have the obligation to provide source with any binary > distributions. Source can be provided directly with the binaries or in > an offer, made available to the public for 3 years. > > You cannot fulfill the obligation by pointing to a 3rd party download > site for the source. Go ask Cisco and others who have had to comply > with this requirement. > > GWT/Google provides neither an offer or the source. > > Not only is Google in violation but I, or any one redistributing GWT, > will be violating LGPL as well. I will have to separately provide the > source any time I distribute GWT. > > GWT package should include the source code for any LGPL components. > > How does one get Google GWT project managers to be aware of this issue? > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
