2009/4/23 Dobes <dob...@gmail.com> > > I'm considering translating my app, but I realized that it currently > takes 12 minutes for GWT to compile the application - thus, for five > languages would it take an hour, is that right?
I wont be five times but it will be a lot more. I would say GWT adds about 85% if you introduce a second language > > > Or is the compiler smart enough to realize that the only thing that > changes between these versions is those strings (no code is changing, > so why recompile and re-optimize it all)? > > It seems like GWT's "permutations" system is really it's greatest > problem for me right now. I think there are relatively few classes > that differ between permutations and the performance gains are > probably not that great. > > > I think it would be a lot better for my purposes to have a single > permutation and just have GWT.create() instantiate the right generated > subclass for the current browser/language setup. In fact, that would > cut my compile time down to just 2 or minutes. > > Has anyone actually measured the benefits of compiling separately for > each browser as opposed to just using an appropriate subclass? > > Any idea how much work it would be to customize the compiler to work > this way? > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
