In general it's important that you know the new portlet specification
as its vital for our decision.
But i will neverthelesse answer your points as you made the effort to
answer mine :-)


> If all developers use your library & at one point all widgets go through
> your library, then you can guarantee the div gets the namespace somehow
> added to the ID.

That "somehow" is what im interested in :-) I can  overwrite a
component and implement
my own naming, where i try to respect my own conventions. But, as im
not in the
portlet code but much more in my GWT-extended Class, there's no way
how i can reach
the portlet specific information.


> I'm not familiar with the JSR (wonder how many people here are).  Can you
> expand on the requirement?

You can create URL's by tag's that can be called from any portlet that
causes a call
of an internal portlet function...like doing a POST on the doPost of a
servlet. The same
goes for RenderURL's...if i create a Render URL and call a specific
page, all portlets on this
page are getting their doView method called, so that they can do their
render operations.



> Please clarify the requirement here.  It's possible to do some level of
> communication between GWT modules that are on 1 page.  Not trivial, but
> possible (but I believe they would have to expose some kind of
> non-conflicting interface, in terms of the function name), but these apps
> would have to be created to begin with with the expectation of being used as
> a JS library.  However, making a GWT-"enabled"-Portlet can just be a simple
> <inherits> away.

My concern is not a GWT-specific communicaton (which could come handy
for sure) but more a
JSR 286 supported way. Only this can ensure, that we can integrate
external portlets, which are supporting
this standard.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to