Where can I get pom.xml examples for GWT 1.6?
Something more elaborate like combo with GWT-EXT or smartgwt would be
nice.

Thanks

On May 5, 5:06 am, Ed <post2edb...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Just point your output dir to your target dir with the codehousepluginand 
> simple ignore it...
> That what I do....
> Works fine...
>
> --Ed
>
> On Apr 16, 3:27 pm, Mark  Renouf <mark.ren...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Themaven-gwt-pluginfrom codehaus is looking quite good at this
> > point. I recommend trying 1.1-SNAPSHOT.
>
> > I just reported an issue with running unit tests (which has been fixed
> > in SVN, waiting on a new SNAPSHOT build). With that it does absolutely
> > everything I've expected (on all platforms, without local
> > configuration) and with very minimal setup (add theplugin, add a
> > dependency ongwt-user, done).
>
> > The one remaining issue is the new build output format (WAR), and how
> > resources are deployed. I'm totally against havingGWTcompile
> > directly into /src/main/webapp. It's completely against the principles
> > of keeping your source tree clean and putting all artifacts under
> > target. If you stick with traditionalmavenapproach, it means you
> > need to execute war:exploded first before launching hosted mode (and
> > again if you want to change something without restarting the hosted
> > mode).
>
> > The other approach is stick with src/main/webapp and make sure the
> > cleanplugincleans out allGWTgenerated files. Again, this is really
> > not the right approach :-(
>
> > On Apr 16, 8:48 am, Arthur Kalmenson <arthur.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > It would definitely be nice if the Google Eclipsepluginwas build
> > > system agnostic, or at least gave you more configuration options.
> > > Maybe we should just file a issue with the Google Eclipseplugin(I
> > > can't find the Google Code project...)?
>
> > > --
> > > Arthur Kalmenson
>
> > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 4:33 AM, Salvador Diaz <diaz.salva...@gmail.com> 
> > > wrote:
>
> > > >> * If you enablegwtsupport on your project,GWTSDK library is
> > > >> automatically added to the project, event if you already manage your
> > > >> dependencies withmaven. You should be able to configure if you want
> > > >> the sdk to be included or not.
> > > >> * Theplugincomplains about output directory not set to "war/WEB-INF/
> > > >> classes". We should be able to configure this in order to work in a
> > > >> standardmavenway.
>
> > > > Those are pretty good remarks, and worth of opening an issue in the
> > > > issue tracker. We could do it the other way round though, and let the
> > > >mavenpluginconfigure everything to conform toGWT'sexpectations,
> > > > remember that Googlers are not reallymavenguys.
>
> > > > Cheers,
>
> > > > Salvador
>
> > > > On Apr 16, 10:09 am, johann_fr <johann.vanack...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> I totally agree on the fact thatgwtteam should not provide themaven
> > > >>plugin, the codehaus one can do the job. They should just take care of
> > > >> beeing able to integrate with any build system.
>
> > > >> My problems with the current google eclipseplugin:
>
> > > >> Johann
>
> > > >> On 16 avr, 08:50, Murray Waters <murray.wat...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > >> > It is in the snapshots repository.
>
> > > >> >http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/codehaus/mojo/gwt-maven-...
>
> > > >> > You will need to add the repository 
> > > >> > ashttp://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/
> > > >> > I believe.
>
> > > >> > On Apr 16, 12:33 pm, Keith Willard <keith.will...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > >> > > Where is the snapshot respository where the versions 1.1-SNAPSHOT
> > > >> > > codehausgwt-maven-pluginlives?  only the 1.0 is in the central
> > > >> > > repository.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to