I'm trying to upgrade from 1.5.2 to 1.6.4 and have the same issue as
the posts above, but I'm not using Maven at all.  When I run in hosted
mode (launching from Eclipse Ganymede), as soon as I click the
"Compile/Browse" button, I get the error message "GWT module needs to
be (re)compiled".  I also get this exception in the hosted mode
console:

[ERROR] Unexpected internal compiler error
java.lang.StackOverflowError: null
        at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.processQueue(ObjectStreamClass.java:
2206)
        at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.lookup(ObjectStreamClass.java:253)
        at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:
1035)
        at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.defaultWriteFields
(ObjectOutputStream.java:1375)
        at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData(ObjectOutputStream.java:
1347)
        at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject
(ObjectOutputStream.java:1290)
        at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:
1079)
        at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:
302)
        at java.util.ArrayList.writeObject(ArrayList.java:569)

etc. (stack trace is very long, but I can provide the whole thing if
necessary).

I read the issue summary, but it's not clear to me how to fix this
issue - is there more detailed documentation available?

Thank you,
Jennifer


On Jul 20, 1:02 am, Sam Brodkin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Fixed.  Summary 
> here:http://code.google.com/p/gwt-maven2-starter-app/issues/detail?id=5&can=1
>
> On Jul 7, 4:58 pm, Sam Brodkin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I had the same problem.  I took the error message's advice and ran it
> > in hosted mode, clicked compile/Browse, then i took the /war directory
> > (or with maven maybe it's in src/main/webapp for you) and copied it to
> > the deploy dir of jboss (tomcat).  I renamed it war.war and started
> > the server (put an exploded war on the server.  That seemed to do it.
> > Now to figure out why the codehaus maven plugin isn't producing an
> > artifact with GWTcompiledcode...
>
> > On Jul 1, 8:48 am, Markus88 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > On 26 Jun., 10:38, strindberg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > I'm having some problems gettingGwt1.6.4 to run on my Tomcat 5.5,
> > > > using the codehouse maven-gwt-plugin 1.1.
>
> > > > I can run my project fine in hosted mode (from Eclipse), but when I
> > > > build a war and deploy it (using the maven plugin), and then go to the
> > > > web page containing the call to myGwtmodule, I get a dialog saying
> > > > "GWTmodulese.Interactiveneedsto be (re)compiled, please run a
> > > > compile or use the Compile/Browse button in hosted mode".
>
> > > > So obviously something goes wrong in the Maven build, but I can't see
> > > > anything obvious. I have loooked in the war file and can see all the
> > > > expected files there, including theGwtfiles.
>
> > > > I realize this might very well be caused my some strange interaction
> > > > in the maven-gwt-plugin, but I thought I should ask here as well.
>
> > > > And does anyone have any tips on how I could go about troubleshooting
> > > > this? The above message doesn't really give me any chance to see
> > > > what's going on. I'm fairly new toGwt, so any debugging tips you
> > > > might have would be welcome.
>
> > > I've got exactly the same Problem! Help Please...
> > > I'm using Smart-Gwton a Bea Weblogic Server and Maven build
> > > It works fine with the hosted Mode, but when I start it with the
> > > explorer
> > > it says "GWTmoduleUserProjektneedsto be (re)compiled, please run a
> > > compile or use the Compile/Browse button in hosted mode".

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to