That's true; I was also thinking of redirect. Also, this is good for non-js browsers. Links users would see it OK, which is really valuable for me.
Although, does not google ban for <body onload='javascript: widnow.location=http://newsite?aaa'/> ? This sounds pretty much like a doorway page. I'm really interested in how searchers treat this. In official release what's they say about cloacking: " So what's an honest web designer to do? The only hard and fast rule is to show Googlebot the exact same thing as your users. If you don't, your site risks appearing suspicious to our search algorithms. This simple rule covers a lot of cases including cloaking, JavaScript redirects, hidden text, and doorway pages. And our engineers have gathered a few more practical suggestions: " (taken from http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/07/best-uses-of-flash.html, though it's old) Unclear moment for me is that what do they mean saying 'exact same thing as your users. '. If it is same content (like compared by user) - your method would work, as you load the SAME page as the one shown to bot. But textually - the contents are different. Bot may think that you're blindly redirecting the user to strange page with the only 1 javascript file inclusion and no content at all. Maybe, something new has happened which allows more SEO methodics and i missed this? Thanks for the point with redirect, Alex. On Sep 9, 2:44 pm, Ian Bambury <[email protected]> wrote: > 2009/9/9 Alexander Cherednichenko <[email protected]> > > > > > Problem in having static content and enriching it with gwt is that > > you'll need to create application for each page (if they are > > different) and app creation in GWT is fairly overheaded. Also, you'll > > need to have gwt app bootstrap on each page load, which is no good. > > Not true. You can keep your content in HTML pages on the server and fetch it > as needed. You then link these pages to create a non-JS site which is > crawlable. If you name the pages after the history token you would use in > the GWT site, then a) you can write a generic function to get the page and > b) you can write a JS script to redirect JS-enabled visitors who click on a > search link to the right place in the GWT app. > > E.g. of you search Google for 'GWT DockPanel' my site's link is ' > examples.roughian.com/Panels__DockPanel.htm' but if you click on the link, > you end up at 'http://examples.roughian.com/index.htm#Panels~DockPanel'. > The initial payload for the site is about 30% of what it would be if the > text were included, and I can update it without a recompile. > > Ian > > http://examples.roughian.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
