On Sep 23, 1:25 am, DuoCentillion <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think currently the browser is more general, more secure, and more
> streamlined a model for broadcasting and communication than anything
> else yet proposed. We dont rely exclusively on java programs or
> applets to do everything because it is not general and is not secure
> and certainly came after the World Wide Web which is again more
> general, more secure, and more streamlined. Than requiring everyone
> to have java installed or adobe air or AOL, Prodigy, or Compuserve or
> whatever just to do the same basic function.
>
> Push for AJAX would be useful for some things, but it might I suspect
> sacrifice some security.
>
> Anyone else agree?
>
I'm not necessarily suggesting that the WWW go away. If what you want
to publish needs to be more general and streamlined, then use the
existing web. What I am talking about is an end to trying to mangle
the existing technologies to meet the less general rich application
needs. For that we have this new internet with an App-Browser.
And one of the main points of this idea is, as I said in my reply to
Daniel, a shift in the public view. We don't talk about requiring
people to have Internet Explorer, or FireFox, or Safari. It's assumed
that you have A browser, and that the browser will handle the
standards of the web. I'm looking at the idea of a browser that
becomes the necessary "plug in" for various programming languages, and
lives on a new internet.
And yes, push.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
