What do I pass to the -server argument when I want gwt 2.0 to run with all the neat GAE stuff (the google eclipse plugin does it automatically in 1.7)
On Nov 18, 10:01 am, Arthur Kalmenson <[email protected]> wrote: > Oh, good to hear. There was some discussion about whether deRPC would > make it into 2.0 or not, and I didn't see it mentioned in the Wiki. > Sorry about that! > > -- > Arthur Kalmenson > > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Chris Ramsdale <[email protected]> wrote: > > The deRPC components live under the com.google.gwt.rpc package and are > > available in the RC. The doc may be a bit sparse or missing in a few spots > > but we're adding content daily as we march towards release. > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Arthur Kalmenson <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >> Congrats on the release! We'll definitely be using GWT 2 in our next > >> project, I can't wait! > > >> But I guess deRPC didn't make it in? Any chance of it appearing before > >> the final release? > > >> -- > >> Arthur Kalmenson > > >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:32 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > You should be in good shape either way, actually. The same project > >> > structure will work with either SDK version, so you can retain the > >> > option to switch back and forth. The only "one-way" choice would be if > >> > you start using the new UiBinder, ClientBundle, and layout panel > >> > stuff. If you need to play it conservatively, you could hold off on > >> > those things, but you can at least start using the new in-browser > >> > development mode, which should make you even more productive as you > >> > push toward your own launch. > > >> > Big picture, though, we're eager to finalize 2.0, so I wouldn't expect > >> > too long an RC cycle this time. In other words, you should even be > >> > safe to start using 2.0-only features in the timeframe you're > >> > describing. > > >> > On Nov 17, 2:23 pm, Yozons Support on Gmail <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> What's the ETA now for GWT 2.0 final? I am developing now under 1.7.1, > >> >> but > >> >> won't expect to be in production for another 4 months or so. Would I > >> >> be > >> >> better off getting a jump on 2.0 now or would I risk 2.0 not being > >> >> ready for > >> >> production over the next several months? > > >> > -- > > >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >> > Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. > >> > To post to this group, send email to > >> > [email protected]. > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> > [email protected]. > >> > For more options, visit this group at > >> >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=. > > >> -- > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > >> "Google Web Toolkit" group. > >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> [email protected]. > >> For more options, visit this group at > >>http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=. > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=.
