To answer my own question: -server com.google.appengine.tools.development.gwt.AppEngineLauncher
On Nov 20, 5:07 pm, Tristan <[email protected]> wrote: > What do I pass to the -server argument when I want gwt 2.0 to run with > all the neat GAE stuff (the google eclipse plugin does it > automatically in 1.7) > > On Nov 18, 10:01 am, Arthur Kalmenson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Oh, good to hear. There was some discussion about whether deRPC would > > make it into 2.0 or not, and I didn't see it mentioned in the Wiki. > > Sorry about that! > > > -- > > Arthur Kalmenson > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Chris Ramsdale <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > The deRPC components live under the com.google.gwt.rpc package and are > > > available in the RC. The doc may be a bit sparse or missing in a few spots > > > but we're adding content daily as we march towards release. > > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Arthur Kalmenson <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > >> Congrats on the release! We'll definitely be using GWT 2 in our next > > >> project, I can't wait! > > > >> But I guess deRPC didn't make it in? Any chance of it appearing before > > >> the final release? > > > >> -- > > >> Arthur Kalmenson > > > >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:32 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > You should be in good shape either way, actually. The same project > > >> > structure will work with either SDK version, so you can retain the > > >> > option to switch back and forth. The only "one-way" choice would be if > > >> > you start using the new UiBinder, ClientBundle, and layout panel > > >> > stuff. If you need to play it conservatively, you could hold off on > > >> > those things, but you can at least start using the new in-browser > > >> > development mode, which should make you even more productive as you > > >> > push toward your own launch. > > > >> > Big picture, though, we're eager to finalize 2.0, so I wouldn't expect > > >> > too long an RC cycle this time. In other words, you should even be > > >> > safe to start using 2.0-only features in the timeframe you're > > >> > describing. > > > >> > On Nov 17, 2:23 pm, Yozons Support on Gmail <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> >> What's the ETA now for GWT 2.0 final? I am developing now under > > >> >> 1.7.1, > > >> >> but > > >> >> won't expect to be in production for another 4 months or so. Would I > > >> >> be > > >> >> better off getting a jump on 2.0 now or would I risk 2.0 not being > > >> >> ready for > > >> >> production over the next several months? > > > >> > -- > > > >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > >> > Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > >> > To post to this group, send email to > > >> > [email protected]. > > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > >> > [email protected]. > > >> > For more options, visit this group at > > >> >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=. > > > >> -- > > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > >> "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > >> [email protected]. > > >> For more options, visit this group at > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=. > > > > -- > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected]. > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=.
