GWT is very helpfull to me. please go to the link http://chemparathy.com/ . This one i developed myself.
On Jan 15, 9:15 pm, Alexander <[email protected]> wrote: > GWT is just a toolkit. You can do whatever you want. Big applications > without good arch seems always be a developers nightmare eventually. So I > think problem anywhere but not in the toolkit. > > P.S. It is really hard to find your questions in text. Maybe its a good idea > to list them? > > 2010/1/13 Hugh Acland <[email protected]> > > > > > > > Hi, > > > I have been experimenting with GWT for a few weeks now and am very > > impressed. Especially with 2.0 and now that Netbeans plugin is fully > > functional. Works like a treat! However, I have yet to pin down > > exactly what GWT should be used for. As far as I can tell it is > > primarily for building rich internet <b>applications</b> which will be > > made available to subscribers through the ubiquitous browser and most > > often through secure logon. I can see the power of using GWT in this > > way. > > > For the past few years I have been quick to ridicule anyone who wanted > > to build web-apps for use in a browser. Anything more complicated than > > the most basic application soon became a complete nightmare to > > implement and sometimes actually functionally impossible. I wrote one > > such app for a client who wanted the 'user experience' to be as good > > as a standard desktop VB/Swing application. It didn't matter how much > > I protested, my pay cheque was dependent upon me complying with his > > wish. So I hacked together a really nasty bunch of Servlets with a > > gazillion 'out.write('<br>...html, html, html </br>')' lines. The > > whole thing was really, really grubby and a real pain to maintain. > > > Now some might say that I could have used JSP/JSF/tags blah blah but > > seriously?!! I love Java and all things J2EE except for the God-awful > > presentation layer. It is unnatural. It is freakish hell. So GWT comes > > along and looks just the ticket! So am I right in saying that GWT > > should not be used for mickey-mouse JS? And that it really is intended > > for serious hard-core browser-based apps - which may also have a > > standard desktop version running off the same server business logic? > > > One other thing. I have fallen in love with a project called Ape (Ajax > > Push Engine) -www.ape-project.orgTo me, all my dreams will have come > > true if I can integrate Ape into a GWT-based web-app. I can already > > hear the cash tills ringing as this is the ultimate missing brick in > > true browser-based applications. Has anyone managed to get the two > > playing nicely together? Wouldn't it be so cool to have a real time > > update (pushed) data into a GWT (or ExtJS) grid? That would really > > float my boat so I would love to hear if this has been achieved yet.. > > > Thanks for reading and if you can I would welcome answers and comments > > Cheers > > Hugh > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<google-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs > > [email protected]> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > -- > Regards, > Alexander
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
