On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 5:29 PM, cretz <[email protected]> wrote: > I too have seen many negative comments on SmartGWT. I am not > associated with the project in any way, but I do use it for several > projects lately. I do agree that some of it is difficult to debug/ > understand do to the extensive use of JSNI. However, I have received > great forum-based support, and I use the LGPL version. That coupled > with the continued improvement of the library make it a great choice. > Ntm, the license makes me happy. > > But I am encouraged by the wrapping of Qooxdoo (finally) at > http://www.ufacekit.org/index.php?cat=02_Qooxdoo&page=01_QxWT. >
The latest Demo can be found here: http://www.ufacekit.org/qxwt/demos/QxDemo-dev/QxDemo.html. The next release is scheduled for End of Febuary and I'm just working on a real world example application as a show case. >From a technical point of view QxWT is doing the same SmartGWT does because after evaluating a complete rewrite in Java it didn't make sense to me from a business point of view (I guess the same was true for SmartGWT). I've used SmartGWT some time ago and didn't had any problems with using it still I decided to start QxWT because though it might sound strange LGPL is something some of my customer don't allow to be used (hence all code is dual licensed under EPL and LGPL) and because I'm confident that there has to be competition and we can learn all from each other. Another important part which made me write the QxWT port is that Qooxdoo-Widgets are plain widgets which means there are no stores and all those stuff but I can create my own domain-model integration (I don't know if this changed since I worked with SmartGWT and GXT). For those interested on the progress can subscribe themselves to my personal blog http://tomsondev.bestsolution.at/ Tom -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
