Thanks Maxim (saw your email), http://demos.telerik.com/silverlight/salesdashboard/ says "Missing plugin". So I left ;) I'm sure silverlight can have great results for controlled end user environments, but one of our goals is to use plain browser functionality, available on all devices.
On Sep 1, 4:40 pm, Maxim <maxim...@gmail.com> wrote: > Marius, > > in your document you compare GWT wih ASP.NET AJAX but I think it > should be rather compared with Silverlight, this is a "client-side" > technology like GWT which is not linked to server. ASP.NET AJAX is > something very different and demands IIS to be installed server-side. > > My story about this comparison. We are having good customer we were > trying to develop forusingGWT. Actually skeleton was developedusing > GWT but then he wanted more modern appearance, and he could pay money > for commercial libs. We figured out that commercial libraries for > Silverlight are light years ahead of what GWT 3rd party libraries can > offer. Price for such libraries are relatively low ( say in comparison > to developer monthly salary), so cost is not a big problem I think. > > e.g.http://demos.telerik.com/silverlight/salesdashboard/ > > Still we love GWT and use it heavily for sayhttp://www.projectkaiser.com:8080/ > > One more thing: from time to time we have browser-compatibilty-related > issues ( not so big though ) with GWT, especially in Firefox. > > Maxim -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.