+1. SmartGWT LGPL is the only option for those who don't have lot of time and/or money to use GWT and still be productive.
If GWT has a decent Table/Grid, Tree, then a lot of users will be content in just using GWT. Now that Designer is also part of the Google, the next step would be for Google to add a few more controls that will make it easy for developers to build apps to really highlight GWT's productivity benefits. BR, ~A On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:53 PM, ingo <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > I am currently doing the GWT project honeycrm > http://code.google.com/p/honeycrm/. > A more powerful set of widget is the very last thing that is missing > in the GWT puzzle. > > On 15 Nov., 09:39, massimo malvestio <[email protected]> > wrote: > > +1 > > I'm currently learning SmartGWT, LGPL version. > > I obviously can't take advantage of everything newly introduced and > waited > > for a long time, like MPV, I had to wrote my own implementation 3 years > ago > > to decouple code, and now I have to use their good implementation, but > > exiting from GWT standard, with a large amount of work, now to adapt my > code > > to SmartGWT, and probably in the future, if there will be a chance, to > adapt > > again my custom code to GWT standards. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<google-web-toolkit%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
