I agree. We need a robust framework which is pretty to look at too. I would rather use code coming out of google than anywhere else to be very honest.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:02 AM, massimo malvestio < [email protected]> wrote: > > >> >> Hi, >> >> I am dreaming from a designed conceptually stable GWT. >> Each year I had to change app due to API-change on concept level! >> >> Even if I understand your needs, I've been in the same situation, I think > it's quite normal that a framework during early years of development could > have an explosive growth of functionalities and changes about code > structure. Developers' needs are getting more and more sophisticated, and as > well sophisticated solutions have to be provided. > I hope that a point of stability for api and best practices could be > reached, and after that GWT team could focus on aspects that now could look > secundary, eye candy widgets, for developers, but those are primary for > users. > Like a Ferrary is made by a state of the art engine and attractive body, a > site has to be robust and easy and pleasant to use > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<google-web-toolkit%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
