Another nice aspect of border-radius over the emulation approach, is
that it lets you avoid aliasing artifacts when changing the page size
via full-page zoom.  For example, if you look at the basic popup on
the showcase, and change the page zoom size in your browser, you can
see occasional single-pixel 'cracks', and the rounded corner ends up
being pixelated.

On Feb 17, 11:37 am, Chi H <[email protected]> wrote:
> I would support just using border-radius for rounded corners and
> living with square corners in IE 6-8.  (Same with using box-shadow for
> shadows, e.g.: in DialogBox)
> I think it still needs to look 'good' on IE6-8, but it doesn't need to
> look exactly the same, and i think missing rounded corners is an
> acceptable difference.
>
> If you are going to take that approach, I think you should also break
> a bit of backwards compatibility with the new theme by changing the
> DOM structure of some of the existing widgets.
> Using border-radius and still having superfluous 3x3 tables all over
> the place seems like a decision that will be regretted down the road.
>
> Internally, we have an internal implementation for buttons and tabs
> that, via deferred binding, uses border-radius on HTML5 browsers, and
> images for rounded corners on IE6-8.  That is not the easiest thing to
> implement (and we didn't try to make it generically theme-able), but
> would be my 'ideal' solution for the widgets where that is possible.
> That being said, there are much higher things on my wishlist than
> that :)
>
> On Feb 17, 9:08 am, John LaBanca <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Chrome, Safari, and Firefox support rounded corners natively in CSS.  How do
> > you guys feel about using CSS rules to create rounded corners on modern
> > browser that support it, but not IE?  It would mean degraded styles in IE,
> > but thats better than degraded styles across the board.
>
> > Thanks,
> > John LaBanca
> > [email protected]
>
> > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Jeff Schwartz 
> > <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > > It is an improvement over previous attempts but can I make a suggestion?
> > > Why not use a top graphic artist? Developers are great at layout but... 
> > > well
> > > you know where I'm going with this.
>
> > Notice josht in the cc list.  Yes, GWT finally has a graphic designer on the
> > team.   Unfortunately, he's constrained by the fact that he cannot change
> > the DOM structure of existing widgets, which limits what he can do.
>
> > > Jeff
>
> > > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 1:12 PM, John LaBanca <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >>  The GWT team is happy to (pre)announce that we will introduce a new,
> > >> more modern CSS style theme in GWT 2.3 called "Clean".  The new theme 
> > >> makes
> > >> existing widgets look cleaner (more business-like) than the "standard"
> > >> theme, and replaces the thick light blue borders with thin gray borders. 
> > >>  We
> > >> worked under the constraint that we would not modify the DOM structure of
> > >> the existing widgets because we didn't want to break existing apps, so 
> > >> this
> > >> new theme is purely a CSS overhaul.
>
> > >> You can preview the new Clean style theme at the link below:
> > >>http://gwt-showcase-clean.appspot.com/
>
> > >> Please let us know what you like and dislike about the new theme, and if
> > >> you are interested in switching your app to it.  Once we release the 
> > >> theme,
> > >> it becomes very difficult to change it without affecting existing apps, 
> > >> so
> > >> early feedback is helpful.
>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> John LaBanca
> > >> [email protected]
>
> > >> --
> > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > >> "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> > >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > >> [email protected].
> > >> For more options, visit this group at
> > >>http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
>
> > > --
> > > *Jeff Schwartz*
> > >http://jefftschwartz.appspot.com/
>
> > >  --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > > "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > [email protected].
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Reply via email to