Hi,

Thanks for nice article, helps in designing best and flexible GWT apps.

Saida.

On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Erik Bens <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> perfect overview - thanks! I already worked with this architecture and
> have to say it is very easy to handle after some tests. Additionally
> use GIN for binding Views and Presenters will makes it easier too.
> One question: Is this architecture also possible with the new
> activity / places approach? Does someone has a diagram / sample for
> it?
>
> Erik
>
> On Mar 1, 6:43 pm, Brian Reilly <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Very good article! Thank you for contributing it!
> >
> > I would be interested to hear from creators/users of the MVP
> > frameworks out there (gwt-mvp, gwt-platform, gwt-presenter, mvp4g,
> > etc.) about which approach is used in each of the frameworks or if the
> > frameworks are approach-agnostic.
> >
> > -Brian
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Geoffrey Wiseman
> >
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > If you're using Model-View-Presenter with GWT (or you're thinking
> > > about it), there are a number of different patterns you can use to co-
> > > ordinate between your view and the corresponding presenter. Ray Ryan's
> > > "Best Practices for Architecting your GWT App" at I/O 2009 showed off
> > > one pattern, Daniel Danilatos refined that for his "GWT Testing Best
> > > Practices" presentation during I/O 2010, and a third pattern was used
> > > in the "Large-Scale Application Development and MVP" article in the
> > > GWT wiki.  Using these and my own experiences with these patterns,
> > > I've taken a small example, demonstrated how to apply each of these
> > > patterns to that example, and written up some of the advantages and
> > > disadvantages.
> >
> > >http://blog.codiform.com/2011/03/view-presenter-interaction-patterns-.
> ..
> >
> > > These patterns are by and large available already in the sources
> > > above, but by bringing them together and talking about some of the
> > > pros and cos, I hope to save some people some of the sorts of
> > > experimentation that many of us will have already gone through to
> > > decide which one of these patterns works best for us.
> >
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> > > For more options, visit this group athttp://
> groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
>
>


-- 
Regards,
-Sai.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Reply via email to