hello, thanks for sharing this. I am having some challenge with its implementation though(using the Ray Ryan's method). How do I use the go() method to serve multiple views if its local type is of HasWidgets?
On 3/1/11, Erik Bens <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > perfect overview - thanks! I already worked with this architecture and > have to say it is very easy to handle after some tests. Additionally > use GIN for binding Views and Presenters will makes it easier too. > One question: Is this architecture also possible with the new > activity / places approach? Does someone has a diagram / sample for > it? > > Erik > > On Mar 1, 6:43 pm, Brian Reilly <[email protected]> wrote: >> Very good article! Thank you for contributing it! >> >> I would be interested to hear from creators/users of the MVP >> frameworks out there (gwt-mvp, gwt-platform, gwt-presenter, mvp4g, >> etc.) about which approach is used in each of the frameworks or if the >> frameworks are approach-agnostic. >> >> -Brian >> >> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Geoffrey Wiseman >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > If you're using Model-View-Presenter with GWT (or you're thinking >> > about it), there are a number of different patterns you can use to co- >> > ordinate between your view and the corresponding presenter. Ray Ryan's >> > "Best Practices for Architecting your GWT App" at I/O 2009 showed off >> > one pattern, Daniel Danilatos refined that for his "GWT Testing Best >> > Practices" presentation during I/O 2010, and a third pattern was used >> > in the "Large-Scale Application Development and MVP" article in the >> > GWT wiki. Using these and my own experiences with these patterns, >> > I've taken a small example, demonstrated how to apply each of these >> > patterns to that example, and written up some of the advantages and >> > disadvantages. >> >> >http://blog.codiform.com/2011/03/view-presenter-interaction-patterns-... >> >> > These patterns are by and large available already in the sources >> > above, but by bringing them together and talking about some of the >> > pros and cos, I hope to save some people some of the sorts of >> > experimentation that many of us will have already gone through to >> > decide which one of these patterns works best for us. >> >> > -- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> > Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. >> > To post to this group, send email to >> > [email protected]. >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > [email protected]. >> > For more options, visit this group >> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > -- Odeyemi 'Kayode O. B.Sc(Hons) Econs, Application Developer & Systems Engineer (Sun Certified Professional), Oracle Certified Associate, Solaris Systems Administrator, Drupal Developer Website: http://sinati.com <http://www.sinati.com> Socialize with me: http://profile.to/charyorde, http://twitter.com/charyorde, http://www.google.com/profiles/dreyemi Skype:drecute -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
