We jumped the gun a bit, but 2.4 is pretty close to becoming "latest" :-)

/dmc

On Friday, July 15, 2011, Thomas Broyer wrote:

> Hmm, shouldn't it have been for "trunk"? I believe @ExtraTypes and
> polymorphism support are not in 2.3, only in the upcoming 2.4.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/AClSV62TkrQJ.
> To post to this group, send email to 
> [email protected]<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 
> '[email protected]');>
> .
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> 'google-web-toolkit%[email protected]');>.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
>


-- 
David Chandler
Developer Programs Engineer, GWT+GAE
w: http://code.google.com/
b: http://turbomanage.wordpress.com/
b: http://googlewebtoolkit.blogspot.com/
t: @googledevtools

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Reply via email to