Hi, -> it would be interesting to see ... a full (albeit simple) application in each framework.
Take a look at this GWTP-based sample: -> http://gwt-cx.com/serendipity/Serendipity.html Cheers Rob On Sep 29, 11:05 pm, Tom Carchrae <[email protected]> wrote: > Mvp4g looks good, certainly more concise than GWTP. When I started using > the GWTP plugin and it generated so much code for me, I got scared. GWTP > would certainly be a good choice if you were following the google-suggested > MVP for big applications. > > The comment discussion here is pretty interesting, with the GWTP and MVP4G > authors defending their design > choices.http://code.google.com/p/mvp4g/wiki/Mvp4g_vs_GWTP > > One day, I'd like to propose a competition with real cash prizes for "most > elegant MVP framework in GWT". For example, in the comment thread above, > it would be interesting to see experts in each framework develop a full > (albeit simple) application in each framework. (Oh, if you have some cash > money now, I'd be pleased if you steal the idea and start this competition > today!) > > I keep wondering, why can't GWT have an MVC model that is as simple as Rails > or PlayFramework? > > Tom > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Felipe Martim Vieira < > > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > Maybe you should have a look at this: > > >http://code.google.com/p/mvp4g/ > > > I have never used it, but it looks like a great alternative to reduce > > the amount of work. > > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 6:14 AM, Aidan O'Kelly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Thomas Broyer <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> And BTW, MVP is a design pattern, and there's no one single way of > > >> implementing it (the MVP articles in the GWT doc makes it kind of > > clear). > > >> And the fact that Activities and Places (which people sometimes > > erroneously > > >> call "MVP framework") are quite new makes it clear that it's not "the" > > way > > >> to build GWT apps: there must have been ways to do it before they're > > >> introduced! > > > > Point taken, the docs do make it very clear its a pattern and one way > > > of implementing it, and that its best suited for large scale projects > > > and why. Though reading through the User Guide, you could be forgiven > > > for thinking 'This is the way I should go with my app!', especially if > > > you decide to use UiBinder, as the Activity/Places MVP article uses it > > > and is almost like a tutorial on building an app. > > > > I guess its just because the other tutorial in the User Guide, the > > > Stock Watcher, doesn't use UiBinder, which is a very attractive > > > feature to anyone new to GWT. Would be nice to have a chapter/tutorial > > > on building a small/medium sized UiBinder based app that doesn't use > > > MVP. > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > > . > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > > -- > > Felipe Martim > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
