On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Frank <[email protected]> wrote: > GXT and SmartGWT have bad performance imo. > Better to write your own widgets (which takes a lot of time) using vanilla > GWT and make them perform better. > That is what we did and our GWT projects have very high performance.
Also our experience. GWT is really really fast. Cheers, Raphael > > Op dinsdag 27 maart 2012 11:55:14 UTC+2 schreef dodo dard het volgende: >> >> Helo, >> >> I've got friends complaining about GWT/GXT (GWT Ext) performances, well I >> notice that if we put to many component with GXT, there will be a certain >> waiting time (3-4s) before it got completely loaded. They said that is >> better to write the application directly with Javascript that may I'm not >> agreed 100%. So guys, is there any solution, best practice, limitation or >> restriction using GXT/GWT ? Or it can't be helped ? >> >> Honestly is fun using GWT/GXT, but I'm looking a performance solution too. >> >> Regards, >> Bowie > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/7IyvlvceBLUJ. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- inc: http://ars-machina.raphaelbauer.com tech: http://ars-codia.raphaelbauer.com web: http://raphaelbauer.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
