Thanks Frank, I think that too, GXT make pretty component but very expensive and very big. Btw I found an interesting website : http://gxtvsgwt.appspot.com/ after looking at your anwser.
Le mardi 27 mars 2012 13:54:52 UTC+2, Frank a écrit : > > GXT and SmartGWT have bad performance imo. > Better to write your own widgets (which takes a lot of time) using vanilla > GWT and make them perform better. > That is what we did and our GWT projects have very high performance. > > Op dinsdag 27 maart 2012 11:55:14 UTC+2 schreef dodo dard het volgende: >> >> Helo, >> >> I've got friends complaining about GWT/GXT (GWT Ext) performances, well I >> notice that if we put to many component with GXT, there will be a certain >> waiting time (3-4s) before it got completely loaded. They said that is >> better to write the application directly with Javascript that may I'm not >> agreed 100%. So guys, is there any solution, best practice, limitation or >> restriction using GXT/GWT ? Or it can't be helped ? >> >> Honestly is fun using GWT/GXT, but I'm looking a performance solution too. >> >> Regards, >> Bowie >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/Gv4FqFlTRqEJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
