We're hoping that the steering committee will make steps for reaching and 
expanding the GWT community more actively.
I think that a great step in this direction is establishing a road-map with 
the help of the community.

Regular GWT Hangouts could also be nice ;)


On Sunday, July 8, 2012 5:01:42 PM UTC+3, Daniel Kurka wrote:
>
> I have been on IO all week and talked to many people from the GWT team and 
> other GWT developers.
>
> I am not worried at all about GWTs future. It had a bad marketing in the 
> last year due to many reasons which we will turn around in the upcoming 
> months with the GWT steering committee.
>
> The GWT 2.5 release is one of the biggest GWT ever and has many new things 
> in there. Wait for Rays talk to appear (in which I play a very small role) 
> on the youtube in a few days to clear things up for you.
>
> -Daniel
>
>
>
>
> Am 06.07.2012 um 22:04 schrieb Murray:
>
> Daniel,
>
> I was at Google I/O last week and decided ask for myself.. the responses I 
> got, was NOT good
> I flat out asked one Googler, working a developer "bar" in the main lobby 
>  (not sure what team he was on) 
> "..should I continue my project that's not yet released, in GWT or 
> what..?" and he appeared to be reluctant
> to say...suggesting that something was up! he then went on to say he would 
> change it to DART as it
> is not yet a complete standard.... So then I asked "..what about 
> JSP/Appengine or Python?"  and with a big Grin
> on if face he shuck his head affirmatively violently ... as if to say 
> he doesn't want it to be said that "he told me so"
>
> right now we need some GWT folks to step up and 
> say something definitive!!!  this "rumor" has been going around for 
> a while now.. and there were no Sessions on GWT at the IO2012 other than 
> Porting GWT to DART !!!
>
> I went to a session on Appengine /REST and a a question was asked at the 
> end of the session regarding 
> REST and GWT the answer was also suspect...
>
> I think this link will take you to the session ..forward to the end...
>  https://developers.google.com/events/io/sessions/gooio2012/121/
>
>
>
>
>
> On Friday, June 22, 2012 1:54:29 PM UTC-4, Daniel Kurka wrote:
>>
>> I can assure you (since I am deeply invested in GWT) that GWT is in no 
>> way of being phased out. The main reason is the amount of other talks 
>> (android, google+) being added to the conference, reducing talk time for 
>> everyone else.
>> As Thomas said before there is something big coming for GWT which will be 
>> announced in Rays talk at IO.
>>
>> There are a lot of google products relying on GWT which is not something 
>> that you could change in a short amount of time. Dart may be an interesting 
>> project, but it is not going to change the way google currently depends on 
>> GWT (at least not in the next years).
>>
>> The fact that the GWT team is looking for team members on the google 
>> employment list should also put you in the direction that this is no where 
>> near dead.
>>
>> So hopefully as a contributer to the project I can calm you nerves a 
>> little.
>>
>> -Daniel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 19.06.2012 um 19:29 schrieb Thomas Lefort:
>>
>>
>> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/Google-Web-Toolkit-Employment/NJmWmKsXQlI
>>
>> sounds pretty healthy to me :)
>>
>> I bet competition will be fierce!
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, 17 May 2012 08:00:00 UTC+2, Celinio Fernandes wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>> I just noticed that the schedule for Google IO 2012 is now available : 
>>> https://developers.google.com/events/io/sessions
>>> Not sure whether it is definitive or not.
>>> I see that this year there is no session dedicated to GWT. How come ? 
>>> But there are 2 sessions dedicated to Dart. Is this a sign ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Google Web Toolkit" group.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/m0up22vaGNoJ.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
>>
>>
>>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/Jh2IrAfsH8MJ.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/wiC33gog6rEJ.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Reply via email to