Ashwin - I am still considering various options. You have a point with 
offline clearing of cache. I would think that with offline storage like *
IndexedDB*  would not be deleted if the user clear the cache. At least the 
user will be prompted if an application data is going to be cleared. I am 
not sure how it works.
My main point is I really do not want to invest in another technology for 
building a local app. I would want to use all the GWT code written so far. 
Also it should be easy to update chrome apps. This should simplify the 
distribution also.


Also I think I would have to use hybrid approach of storing data in cloud. 
But I have the challenge of security. I would may be need to encrypt data 
using a key which only resides locally. There are lot of unknowns and I 
would have to figure out.

Vishal

On Thursday, July 12, 2012 11:01:05 AM UTC+5:30, Ashwin Desikan wrote:
>
> Vishal,
>
> What options have you considered so far? Check out html5 offline Mode. 
> This maybe a good way to store data offline and probably sync to the server 
> if your customer wants the data to be available online. 
>
> One issue with offline Mode would the data would be cleared if the user 
> cleans up his browser cache/ temp files. 
>
> ~Ashwin
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jul 12, 2012, at 10:12 AM, Vishal Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I  have made a enterprise application using GWT and AppEngine. There are 
> some set of customers who want the data to be stored locally only for 
> security reasons.
>
> I am planning to develop an Chrome offline 
> app<http://code.google.com/chrome/extensions/trunk/apps/about_apps.html> by 
> using most of the current code. I have to change my current data server 
> layer ( AppEngine) to something locally. There is lot of GWT code written 
> which I would like to reuse in my offline app. The question is can this be 
> all done ?  As I understand the GWT layer should just work in my offline 
> app. I  think the hard problem is the data layer.
>
> Any thoughts on the above problem will be appreciated.
>
>
> Vishal
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/G_FefTZQcQoJ>
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/G_FefTZQcQoJ.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/NDBgxaQCT8MJ.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Reply via email to