Have you looked at something like titanium desktop or adobe air ? With them u could reuse 99% of the code you have right now On Jul 12, 2012 9:15 AM, "Vishal Singh" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ashwin - I am still considering various options. You have a point with > offline clearing of cache. I would think that with offline storage like * > IndexedDB* would not be deleted if the user clear the cache. At least > the user will be prompted if an application data is going to be cleared. I > am not sure how it works. > My main point is I really do not want to invest in another technology for > building a local app. I would want to use all the GWT code written so far. > Also it should be easy to update chrome apps. This should simplify the > distribution also. > > > Also I think I would have to use hybrid approach of storing data in cloud. > But I have the challenge of security. I would may be need to encrypt data > using a key which only resides locally. There are lot of unknowns and I > would have to figure out. > > Vishal > > On Thursday, July 12, 2012 11:01:05 AM UTC+5:30, Ashwin Desikan wrote: >> >> Vishal, >> >> What options have you considered so far? Check out html5 offline Mode. >> This maybe a good way to store data offline and probably sync to the server >> if your customer wants the data to be available online. >> >> One issue with offline Mode would the data would be cleared if the user >> cleans up his browser cache/ temp files. >> >> ~Ashwin >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Jul 12, 2012, at 10:12 AM, Vishal Singh <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I have made a enterprise application using GWT and AppEngine. There are >> some set of customers who want the data to be stored locally only for >> security reasons. >> >> I am planning to develop an Chrome offline >> app<http://code.google.com/chrome/extensions/trunk/apps/about_apps.html> by >> using most of the current code. I have to change my current data server >> layer ( AppEngine) to something locally. There is lot of GWT code written >> which I would like to reuse in my offline app. The question is can this be >> all done ? As I understand the GWT layer should just work in my offline >> app. I think the hard problem is the data layer. >> >> Any thoughts on the above problem will be appreciated. >> >> >> Vishal >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Google Web Toolkit" group. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/G_FefTZQcQoJ> >> https://groups.google.com/d/**msg/google-web-toolkit/-/G_**FefTZQcQoJ<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/G_FefTZQcQoJ> >> . >> To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@** >> googlegroups.com <[email protected]>. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+** >> [email protected]<[email protected]> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** >> group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en<http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en> >> **. >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/NDBgxaQCT8MJ. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
