Hi Tomas, when I named GWT MVP I tried to refer to Activities and Places (https://developers.google.com/web-toolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideMvpActivitiesAndPlaces) not to gwt-mvp thats why I used capitalized words :)
So if I want to start a GWT development from scratch right now the best option is to use Activities & Places, right? I am asking beacause in my last project I had a lot of boiler plate code, a View, ViewImpl, Activity & Place for every crud action (update + create / list) on every entity that I had to work with. That's why I was trying to see if there something "new" to reduce the boilerplate code. El viernes, 7 de septiembre de 2012 03:21:55 UTC-3, Thomas Broyer escribió: > > > On Friday, September 7, 2012 5:12:49 AM UTC+2, vehdra music wrote: >> >> Hi, already know about gwtp, mvp4g, guit, GWT MVP, etc. >> >> But I have been some time outside from GWT world :( so now I am returning >> to this beatiful framework again and I would to know which have been your >> experiences, wich mvp framework do you recommend to use in this days? >> > > Highly personal (and probably biased) view: best framework == no framework. > Not about MVP per se but as there's been much misinformation (and you talk > about "GWT MVP", which doesn't actuallyexist): Activities & Places is > lightweight enough that it doesn't come in your way; it's a toolkit/library > more than a framework if you ask me. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/EeyAVy4ZHPkJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
