Manuel said: > . are you planning to send this to gwt? > . to play with this code, do I have to download the entire kit or may I > patch just some classes? > . does it work with 2.5.
I plan to merge 2.5 once it's released. I expect it'll work, though there might be trade offs. We absolutely need the BFCache for our app because it runs cross-page. So we'd override anything that was incompatible, if we had to. If you need to patch it across to the RC meantime, here are the diffs: http://zelea.com/var/db/repo/gwt/ If anyone else finds it useful, we can look at sending it upstream. -- Michael Allan Toronto, +1 416-699-9528 http://zelea.com/ Manuel Carrasco Moñino said: > On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Michael Allan <m...@zelea.com> wrote: > > > Manuel Carrasco Moñino said: > > > ... basically a gwt app is a javascript inside an html, ... so when > > > you change to other html [page], your app is unloaded from memory > > > and you have to load it in the new html [page]. > > > > If anyone needs to avoid page unloading, here's a branch of GWT with > > limited support for the BFCache (rapid back-and-forth navigation): > > http://zelea.com/project/gwt/ > > > Michael, Interesting stuff, a couple of cuestions: > . are you planning to send this to gwt? > . to play with this code, do I have to download the entire kit or may I > patch just some classes? > . does it work with 2.5. > > - Manolo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
