Thanks, you confirmed my suspicions. Are you saying I can use Splittable to achieve polymorphism? How? Have you ever tried? Of course I can somehow get rid of polymorphism in my classes, but I'd rather do not.
On Saturday, October 13, 2012 1:41:46 PM UTC+2, Thomas Broyer wrote: > > No, AutoBean has no mean to support polymorphism, and it specifically > cannot be used for your use-case. > You can possibly use Splittable, at a lower-level, or Elemental's JSON, JS > overlays, or JSONObject. > > On Saturday, October 13, 2012 12:40:16 PM UTC+2, Andrea Boscolo wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> I am developing an app in which I use (or at least I would like to use) >> AutoBeans for serializing data. Unfortunately it seems to me that >> polymorphism is not supported i.e., I lost the concrete type once I >> deserialize the json in client-side, only the Base supertype is available. >> I looked everywhere but I haven't found some concrete answer, so I hope >> someone has already faced (and why not, solved) this problem. >> I created a really simple testcase that can be found on >> https://gist.github.com/3884099 >> >> I know AutoBean is behind RequestFactory so I though it supports >> polymorphism as well. I don't want to rely on RF as I do not need such >> complexity, I just simply need a way to serialize beans using AutoBean, but >> polymorphism is a must. >> >> Is is even achievable? Hope someone can help. >> >> Thanks in advance, >> Andrew. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/rQYMv74T3lMJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
