On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 08:40 -0700, :mrz wrote: > I also agree there's a revocation process but I'm less clear on how you > determine someone's no longer active.
I think David is right. Let's not try to over-complicate things. It's better to have a well-defined policy on who gets a @mozilla.org alias and keeps it forever (unless of course cases of abuse), than the other way around. Although I agree in principle with the "why only employees and reps?" argument I think we should consider this as a try out phase. See how that goes and how we can expand this to all active contributors. Hopefully by that time we'll have a way to reliable determine if a person is an active contributor. ~nikos https://mozillians.org/u/comzeradd/ _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
